![]() ![]() Section 16: Gun Work Subject: Roll Your Own Msg# 1210796
|
||||||
I don't see the average shooter running out and buying this kit based on his article--he doesn't make it sound easy.
I thought the same thing and had visions of taking a shoe box full of parts to my local gunsmith. One thing I disliked was the offside tab on the safety lock, put there to allow the right side stock panel to hold the safety in place. That wouldn't affect me because I don't have any 1911s with ambi safeties and would replace that part with a single, left-side safety lock, probably a "bullet-proof" version from Wilson. I have acquired 1911s with both kinds of ambi thumb safeties and both have been trouble free but I shoot right-handed and prefer having just one safety lock on the holster-protected side of the frame. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: I've read Patrick Sweeney before, even a couple of books he's written, and don't remember him having such difficulty with English. ![]() As to the pistol, I don't see the average shooter running out and buying this kit based on his article--he doesn't make it sound easy. Most serious 1911 guys probably understood it, but even then, a lot of his comments were convoluted. The kit sounded decent. One thing I disliked was the offside tab on the safety lock, put there to allow the right side stock panel to hold the safety in place. That is a cheesy option used by cheapo gun makers who can't be bothered to make a two-sided safety lock properly by having the pin locking together via a slotted shaft. Any time I see that feature on a 1911 I walk away. Cheesy off-side safety (Wilson) with extra flat for stock panel to hold it in place:
Proper off-side safety (Ed Brown)with internal slotted shaft to hold it together: |