8/27/2014 4:40:08 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: Guns/General Subject: Shooting Groups Msg# 898096
|
||||||
See my last message to Mark... I understand why people do that but I believe a huge number of people who see it do not and are confused as to why anyone would consider any miss as something desirable. Today, especially with new shooters flooding our ranks, we need to be especially clear and precise in communicating thoughts and ideas and, for all the points I have been trying to make, publishing pictures of off-target groups simply doesn't do that.
The newbie guy, or the old time shooter to whom accuracy is "It" who sees this in a new gun review glances at it and wonders why on earth anyone would consider a group that far off-target acceptable from a gun that expensive fired by a so-called expert. He doubts the credibility of the writer (and therefore the magazine) and may not buy that rifle. If a gun is capable of shooting a half-inch group and capable of centering that group on the bullseye they would have done it, right? Not everyone is as concerned with all aspects of shooting as some of us here on the forum are and I believe that perception (especially first impressions) has trumped reality for at least the last two decades. I think this is one heck of a useful purpose for showing pictures of tight groups centered on bullseyes rather than off where a "miss is as good as a mile". |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Okay, about those already tight groups in pictures. Their purpose isn't to show off the skill of the operator but to show the capability of the firearm to do just that - group tightly. It would serve no useful purpose to move the group to the bull's-eye - a half-inch group stands on its own. I think it's understood by just about everyone that such a group can be easily shifted to any point required. Do you want it dead-on at 100 yards, no problem. Do you want it two inches high at 100 yards to better allow center hold at ranges out to 200 yards? No problem there, either. The point is made - the gun shoots. The rest is obviously up to the shooter. Why is that so wrong? Stu |