8/27/2014 4:52:34 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: Guns/General Subject: Shooting Groups Msg# 898098
|
||||||
Then I guess our real difference is in whether or not we believe people will be put off by seeing the group not centered.
I'll bow to you in that some folks likely will but I don't think the number is big. That it's a pet peeve of yours I can believe but it just doesn't rock my boat in the greater scheme of things. Stu |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: See my last message to Mark... I understand why people do that but I believe a huge number of people who see it do not and are confused as to why anyone would consider any miss as something desirable. Today, especially with new shooters flooding our ranks, we need to be especially clear and precise in communicating thoughts and ideas and, for all the points I have been trying to make, publishing pictures of off-target groups simply doesn't do that. The newbie guy, or the old time shooter to whom accuracy is "It" who sees this in a new gun review glances at it and wonders why on earth anyone would consider a group that far off-target acceptable from a gun that expensive fired by a so-called expert. He doubts the credibility of the writer (and therefore the magazine) and may not buy that rifle. If a gun is capable of shooting a half-inch group and capable of centering that group on the bullseye they would have done it, right? Not everyone is as concerned with all aspects of shooting as some of us here on the forum are and I believe that perception (especially first impressions) has trumped reality for at least the last two decades. I think this is one heck of a useful purpose for showing pictures of tight groups centered on bullseyes rather than off where a "miss is as good as a mile". |