8/28/2014 1:12:20 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: Guns/General Subject: Shooting Groups Msg# 898180
|
||||||
One thing I want to mention. I wasn't really talking about photos in magazines. I don't know about anyone else, but I believe Bob commented on our very own "braggin' groups" in the forum's photo area. I find myself thinking more about those than magazine photos, though in my mind I can easily justify magazine photos, especially with borrowed, fixed sight handguns, being tested for an article. But I really felt the criticism of our own members' "braggin' groups" as somehow not worth "braggin'" about because they weren't centered on the assumed aiming point. That cuts a bit, while of course I have no horse in the race when it comes to critiquing magazine writers. | ||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: See my last message to Mark... I understand why people do that but I believe a huge number of people who see it do not and are confused as to why anyone would consider any miss as something desirable. Today, especially with new shooters flooding our ranks, we need to be especially clear and precise in communicating thoughts and ideas and, for all the points I have been trying to make, publishing pictures of off-target groups simply doesn't do that. The newbie guy, or the old time shooter to whom accuracy is "It" who sees this in a new gun review glances at it and wonders why on earth anyone would consider a group that far off-target acceptable from a gun that expensive fired by a so-called expert. He doubts the credibility of the writer (and therefore the magazine) and may not buy that rifle. If a gun is capable of shooting a half-inch group and capable of centering that group on the bullseye they would have done it, right? Not everyone is as concerned with all aspects of shooting as some of us here on the forum are and I believe that perception (especially first impressions) has trumped reality for at least the last two decades. I think this is one heck of a useful purpose for showing pictures of tight groups centered on bullseyes rather than off where a "miss is as good as a mile". |