3/5/2015 2:11:00 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 11: Tactical / Training Subject: Conceal Carry Badge Msg# 915186
|
||||||
I think that magazines have some responsibility to screen their advertisers but that this silly badge doesn't rise to that threshold. Of course, each magazine must decide for itself. More important that the potential buyer uses some forethought - caveat emptor is still a pretty good rule!
I would save such censorship for ads for jihadist websites, books on how to be a pederast and things of that ilk! Stu |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Yeah they must be, or they wouldn't still be advertised for sale in every gun mag. What do you think (everyone) about gun mags accepting advertising for such items? Is there any responsibility on the magazine's part to show some judgment, or should they accept any advertising as long as the item is legal? |